Text Details
 
|
Those who reject the argument that natural science has progressed and social science has languished take up their counterargument at the very foundations of the philosophy of natural science. To begin with, it is sometimes held that the natural sciences have not in fact made the kind of progress ordinarily attributed to them.
|
| Language: |
English |
| Submitted by: |
Deroche1
|
This text has been typed
more than
1000 times:
| Avg. speed: |
80 WPM |
| Avg. accuracy: |
96.6% |
Top 10 scores for this text
|
User |
Speed |
Accuracy |
Points |
Place |
Date |
Options |
| 1 |
arenasnow |
218 WPM |
100.0%
|
193
|
1/2 |
April 19, 2019
|
|
| 2 |
kreufr |
198 WPM |
96.0%
|
175
|
1/3 |
Aug. 2, 2019
|
|
| 3 |
plover_learner |
196 WPM |
96.0%
|
173
|
1/5 |
March 13, 2019
|
|
| 4 |
arenasnow2 |
192 WPM |
99.0%
|
170
|
1/3 |
April 13, 2018
|
|
| 5 |
uberkelium |
183 WPM |
100.0%
|
N/A
|
1/2 |
July 21, 2017
|
|
| 6 |
mporsche02 |
180 WPM |
99.0%
|
159
|
1/3 |
Feb. 22, 2019
|
|
| 7 |
mako640 |
177 WPM |
99.0%
|
157
|
1/3 |
March 19, 2019
|
|
| 8 |
alpha_panda |
177 WPM |
99.0%
|
156
|
1/3 |
Oct. 28, 2018
|
|
| 9 |
arc_sec |
176 WPM |
98.0%
|
156
|
1/1 |
Oct. 3, 2018
|
|
| 10 |
eikomaniac |
175 WPM |
100.0%
|
154
|
1/3 |
Dec. 3, 2019
|
|
(book)
by Alexander Rosenberg